Suchergebnisse

Розглянуто недосліджену проблему впливу ідеології лібертаріанства на формування національної та громадянської свідомості. Доведено, що ідеологія лібертаріанства є руйнівною політичною технологією, спричиняє загрози процесам державотворення в Україні і є ідеологією викликів національній та громадянській ідентичності. Визначено, що ідеологія має визначальний вплив на формування державної політики, державного курсу забезпечення національної і громадської єдності Української держави. ; Problem setting. Libertarianism filled the Ukrainian ideological space immediately after the July 31, 2019 presidential election. at that time V. Zelensky's adviser, and now the vice-speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Ruslan Stefanchuk declared that the ideology of the political party "Servants of the People" would be libertarianism.The technology of ideological intervention to gain power is not new. The danger of libertarianism is a legalized official ideology that promotes the destruction of the foundations of the state, the statehood of Ukraine. According to the main speaker of "Servant of the People" R. Stefanchuk, "the state should keep only service functions".Recent research and publications analysis. Conditions of influence of society's political capacity and ideological technologies were the subject of study by the National Institute for Strategic Studies, including the study "Ukraine in the semantic wars of postmodernism: the transformation of Ukrainian national identity in globalization" by N. Pelagesha. The author draws attention to the problem of creating a supranational pan-Russian identity in Ukraine, emphasizing that Ukraine is the object of the policy of forming a pan-Russian identity, which contradicts the goals of state formation and Ukraine's European integration aspirations.Monographic study "Worldview, culture, ideology. Challenges of Globalization" by D. Viter, B. Glotov, O. Korkhe, A. Reshetnichenko, highlight the importance of ideology for the existence of the Ukrainian state and national identity.To consider this problem, John Rex's research "Ethnic Identity and the Nation-State: The Political Sociology of Multicultural Societies" was taken into account.The study of national identity and its formation as a collective phenomenon, the political consequences of this phenomenon, identity and ideology that lead to instability have been the subject of study by Anthony D. Smith.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The proposed political ideology of the Servants of the People party in these extremely difficult conditions, libertarianism, is a project that is essentially destructive, deliberately aimed at developing free-thinking and denying the existence of a state institution as such. The proposed ideology is a technology for the destruction of the state mechanism, a successful "invention" in the context of a hybrid war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine.The dangerous hidden uncertainty of libertarianism is exacerbated by the unformed political course and the lack of public policy.Libertarianism in the Ukrainian realities should be considered meaningfully in the vector of national security. It is necessary to explore the challenges and risks posed by the propaganda of this trend for Ukrainian statehood.Paper main body. The development of state-building processes in Ukraine, the formation of the system of state power takes place under conditions of insufficient institutionalization of the main power structures, the unregulation of their legal status and the scope of competencies.Libertarianism, in fact, is an "illusory ideology for the distortion of forms of consciousness" in Ukrainian society and a direct threat to the constitutional foundations of the state, essentially modernized Bolshevism.The main threat to the ideology of libertarianism is the destruction of the foundations of state formation, the absence of state policy that determines the directions and principles of social development, respectively, the national political course.The ideology of the Ukrainian state is a factor in state formation and Ukrainization of public life and social protection. Traditionally, the Ukrainian idea of state-building was based on the principles of national and public solidarity, rejecting the slogans of communism with the dictatorship of the proletariat and distorted forms of liberalism.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. In connection with the massive onset of chaos technology in the form of libertarianism, attention should be paid to the problem of data destruction, the ideological maneuver of civic and national identity. Issues of ideology, as a determinant of national and public identity, solidarity are issues of national security of Ukraine. The so-called libertarian ideology in modern Ukrainian society is aimed at destroying the years of military aggression of the Russian Federation, national and civic solidarity, national and civic identity, in particular. Ukraine is a threat to national security and the existence of the state.

Розглянуто недосліджену проблему впливу ідеології лібертаріанства на формування національної та громадянської свідомості. Доведено, що ідеологія лібертаріанства є руйнівною політичною технологією, спричиняє загрози процесам державотворення в Україні і є ідеологією викликів національній та громадянській ідентичності. Визначено, що ідеологія має визначальний вплив на формування державної політики, державного курсу забезпечення національної і громадської єдності Української держави. ; Problem setting. Libertarianism filled the Ukrainian ideological space immediately after the July 31, 2019 presidential election. at that time V. Zelensky's adviser, and now the vice-speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Ruslan Stefanchuk declared that the ideology of the political party "Servants of the People" would be libertarianism.The technology of ideological intervention to gain power is not new. The danger of libertarianism is a legalized official ideology that promotes the destruction of the foundations of the state, the statehood of Ukraine. According to the main speaker of "Servant of the People" R. Stefanchuk, "the state should keep only service functions".Recent research and publications analysis. Conditions of influence of society's political capacity and ideological technologies were the subject of study by the National Institute for Strategic Studies, including the study "Ukraine in the semantic wars of postmodernism: the transformation of Ukrainian national identity in globalization" by N. Pelagesha. The author draws attention to the problem of creating a supranational pan-Russian identity in Ukraine, emphasizing that Ukraine is the object of the policy of forming a pan-Russian identity, which contradicts the goals of state formation and Ukraine's European integration aspirations.Monographic study "Worldview, culture, ideology. Challenges of Globalization" by D. Viter, B. Glotov, O. Korkhe, A. Reshetnichenko, highlight the importance of ideology for the existence of the Ukrainian state and national identity.To consider this problem, John Rex's research "Ethnic Identity and the Nation-State: The Political Sociology of Multicultural Societies" was taken into account.The study of national identity and its formation as a collective phenomenon, the political consequences of this phenomenon, identity and ideology that lead to instability have been the subject of study by Anthony D. Smith.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The proposed political ideology of the Servants of the People party in these extremely difficult conditions, libertarianism, is a project that is essentially destructive, deliberately aimed at developing free-thinking and denying the existence of a state institution as such. The proposed ideology is a technology for the destruction of the state mechanism, a successful "invention" in the context of a hybrid war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine.The dangerous hidden uncertainty of libertarianism is exacerbated by the unformed political course and the lack of public policy.Libertarianism in the Ukrainian realities should be considered meaningfully in the vector of national security. It is necessary to explore the challenges and risks posed by the propaganda of this trend for Ukrainian statehood.Paper main body. The development of state-building processes in Ukraine, the formation of the system of state power takes place under conditions of insufficient institutionalization of the main power structures, the unregulation of their legal status and the scope of competencies.Libertarianism, in fact, is an "illusory ideology for the distortion of forms of consciousness" in Ukrainian society and a direct threat to the constitutional foundations of the state, essentially modernized Bolshevism.The main threat to the ideology of libertarianism is the destruction of the foundations of state formation, the absence of state policy that determines the directions and principles of social development, respectively, the national political course.The ideology of the Ukrainian state is a factor in state formation and Ukrainization of public life and social protection. Traditionally, the Ukrainian idea of state-building was based on the principles of national and public solidarity, rejecting the slogans of communism with the dictatorship of the proletariat and distorted forms of liberalism.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. In connection with the massive onset of chaos technology in the form of libertarianism, attention should be paid to the problem of data destruction, the ideological maneuver of civic and national identity. Issues of ideology, as a determinant of national and public identity, solidarity are issues of national security of Ukraine. The so-called libertarian ideology in modern Ukrainian society is aimed at destroying the years of military aggression of the Russian Federation, national and civic solidarity, national and civic identity, in particular. Ukraine is a threat to national security and the existence of the state.

Розглянуто не вивчену проблему дії міжнародного права в частині порушення суверенітету та територіальної цілісності України, через воєнну агресію Російської Федерації. Доведено, що такі протиправні дії необхідно розглядати в межах міжнародного воєнного (гуманітарного) права. Встановлено необхідність залучення міжнародних організацій для вирішення цього збройного конфлікту, за умови їх міжнародної правосуб'єктності. Визначено недосконалість правових механізмів, міжнародного впливу щодо покарання Російської Федерації за порушення основоположних норм, принципів міжнародного права, встановленого міжнародного правопорядку. ; Problem setting. The military aggression of the RF against Ukraine violates the norms and principles of international law. The General Assembly of the United Nations in the 1970 Declaration of Principles of International Law 2625 (XXV) points to the prohibition of violence, the peaceful settlement of disputes, the prohibition of intervention, and the obligation of states to comply with international legal obligations, in accordance with the UN Charter.Recent research and publications analysis. Armed attack, annexation and intervention of the Russian Federation against Ukraine were the subject of investigation of O. Zadorozhny in monographs: "Violation of the basic principles of international law by the aggressive war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine", "Crimean annexation as an international crime", and two Russian-language publications: "Russian doctrine of the international rights after the annexation of the Crimea", "Justify at all costs. The aggressive war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the transformation of Russia's vision of international law", which were published in the period from 2015 to 2016. Within the framework of legal qualifications, the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine is investigated by M. Kononenko, an international lawyer in the article "Five years of occupation of the Crimea: in search of a policy of non-recognition".O. Tsebenko, in his statement, "The UN International Court: Ukraine's Action Against the Russian Federation", notes that one of the international mechanisms for ending the war is the appeal to the UN International Court of Justice.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The purpose of this article is the legal substantiation of recognition of the facts of aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the disclosure of the mechanisms provided by international law for the termination of unlawful actions, military aggression, annexation, occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine by the Russian Federation.Legal conflicts arise as to the feasibility of holding the Minsk meetings, as the negotiators, except the aggressor country of the Russian Federation, have no international commitments, bilateral agreements, as to preserving the territorial integrity of Ukraine.Of particular note is the non-fulfillment by the Russian Federation of the obligations of the international treaty "Budapest Memorandum on Security Guarantees in connection with the accession of Ukraine to the 1994 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons". Paper main body. The United Nations, (UN Charter, Art. 1, Art. 2) is the central institution that ordinates the United Nations in support of peace and international security under the UN Charter. In accordance with Article 1 of the UN Charter, this international organization aims to maintain world peace, international security, take effective collective measures to prevent the threat to peace, prevent aggression (acts of aggression) and settle international disputes on the basis of international law. Membership in the United Nations is stipulated in Article 3 and Article 4 of the UN Charter.Violations by the Russian Federation of the principles of territorial integrity and inviolability of the borders of Ukraine have been confirmed by the international community in the acts of the existing institutions, whose activity and competence is related to these issues.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Prolonged military actions on the territory of Ukraine, parts of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts require a consistent, legally executed internal and external security policy and decisive action to restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine in accordance with international law. The legal qualification of an armed conflict in part of the territory of Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts should be established in accordance with the norms of international law. Accordingly, the Ukrainian side must prepare materials for consideration by the International Criminal Court.

Розглянуто не вивчену проблему дії міжнародного права в частині порушення суверенітету та територіальної цілісності України, через воєнну агресію Російської Федерації. Доведено, що такі протиправні дії необхідно розглядати в межах міжнародного воєнного (гуманітарного) права. Встановлено необхідність залучення міжнародних організацій для вирішення цього збройного конфлікту, за умови їх міжнародної правосуб'єктності. Визначено недосконалість правових механізмів, міжнародного впливу щодо покарання Російської Федерації за порушення основоположних норм, принципів міжнародного права, встановленого міжнародного правопорядку. ; Problem setting. The military aggression of the RF against Ukraine violates the norms and principles of international law. The General Assembly of the United Nations in the 1970 Declaration of Principles of International Law 2625 (XXV) points to the prohibition of violence, the peaceful settlement of disputes, the prohibition of intervention, and the obligation of states to comply with international legal obligations, in accordance with the UN Charter.Recent research and publications analysis. Armed attack, annexation and intervention of the Russian Federation against Ukraine were the subject of investigation of O. Zadorozhny in monographs: "Violation of the basic principles of international law by the aggressive war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine", "Crimean annexation as an international crime", and two Russian-language publications: "Russian doctrine of the international rights after the annexation of the Crimea", "Justify at all costs. The aggressive war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the transformation of Russia's vision of international law", which were published in the period from 2015 to 2016. Within the framework of legal qualifications, the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine is investigated by M. Kononenko, an international lawyer in the article "Five years of occupation of the Crimea: in search of a policy of non-recognition".O. Tsebenko, in his statement, "The UN International Court: Ukraine's Action Against the Russian Federation", notes that one of the international mechanisms for ending the war is the appeal to the UN International Court of Justice.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The purpose of this article is the legal substantiation of recognition of the facts of aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the disclosure of the mechanisms provided by international law for the termination of unlawful actions, military aggression, annexation, occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine by the Russian Federation.Legal conflicts arise as to the feasibility of holding the Minsk meetings, as the negotiators, except the aggressor country of the Russian Federation, have no international commitments, bilateral agreements, as to preserving the territorial integrity of Ukraine.Of particular note is the non-fulfillment by the Russian Federation of the obligations of the international treaty "Budapest Memorandum on Security Guarantees in connection with the accession of Ukraine to the 1994 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons". Paper main body. The United Nations, (UN Charter, Art. 1, Art. 2) is the central institution that ordinates the United Nations in support of peace and international security under the UN Charter. In accordance with Article 1 of the UN Charter, this international organization aims to maintain world peace, international security, take effective collective measures to prevent the threat to peace, prevent aggression (acts of aggression) and settle international disputes on the basis of international law. Membership in the United Nations is stipulated in Article 3 and Article 4 of the UN Charter.Violations by the Russian Federation of the principles of territorial integrity and inviolability of the borders of Ukraine have been confirmed by the international community in the acts of the existing institutions, whose activity and competence is related to these issues.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Prolonged military actions on the territory of Ukraine, parts of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts require a consistent, legally executed internal and external security policy and decisive action to restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine in accordance with international law. The legal qualification of an armed conflict in part of the territory of Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts should be established in accordance with the norms of international law. Accordingly, the Ukrainian side must prepare materials for consideration by the International Criminal Court.

Розглянено недосліджений напрямок історичного розвитку України у складіІІІ Рейху Німеччини, в межах дії норм міжнародного права. Наголошено, що до подій, пов'язаних із масовими вбивствами цивільного польського та країнського населення на Волині у травні – листопаді 1943 р., мали безпосереднє відношення військові формування, приналежність яких до ОУН(б), ОУН(м) УПА, польських військових формувань, радянських диверсійних партизанських загонів потребує об'єктивного дослідження. Брак підтверджень та достовірних фактів використано для набуття політичних дивідендів та провокаційної діяльності, що є загрозою українсько-польським відносинам. ; The unexplored direction of the historical development of Ukraine within the ThirdReich of Germany, within the limits of the norms of international law is considered. It is emphasized that the military formations, the affiliation of which to the OUN (b), the OUN (m) of the UPA, the Polish military formations, and the military units of the UPA, Soviet sabotage guerrilla detachments require an objective study. The lack of evidence and reliable information is used to gain political dividends and for provocative activities, which threatens Ukrainian-Polish relations.

This article analyzes the cooperation between Ukraine and the European commission "For Democracy through Law" (Venice Commission) in the sphere of judicial reform implementation. The article highlights the main principles of bilateral cooperation and of legislative initiatives in the justice sphere. The main European justice standards and international obligations towards the functioning of the Judiciary are defined. The article asserts that the main obstacles of the independent judicial system in Ukraine are the inconsistent implementation of strategic priorities for national justice system reform and the imperfection of public administration in this sphere. ; Проаналізовано співпрацю України з Європейською комісією "За демократію через право" (Венеціанською комісією) у сфері впровадження судової реформи. Виділено головні принципи двостороннього співробітництва, законодавчих ініціатив у сфері правосуддя. Визначено основні європейські стандарти судочинства, міжнародні зобов'язання щодо функціонування судової гілки влади. Стверджено, що основними перешкодами незалежної судової системи в Україні є непослідовність втілення стратегічних пріоритетів реформування національної сфери правосуддя та недосконалість державного управління у цій сфері.

This article analyzes the cooperation between Ukraine and the European commission "For Democracy through Law" (Venice Commission) in the sphere of judicial reform implementation. The article highlights the main principles of bilateral cooperation and of legislative initiatives in the justice sphere. The main European justice standards and international obligations towards the functioning of the Judiciary are defined. The article asserts that the main obstacles of the independent judicial system in Ukraine are the inconsistent implementation of strategic priorities for national justice system reform and the imperfection of public administration in this sphere. ; Проаналізовано співпрацю України з Європейською комісією "За демократію через право" (Венеціанською комісією) у сфері впровадження судової реформи. Виділено головні принципи двостороннього співробітництва, законодавчих ініціатив у сфері правосуддя. Визначено основні європейські стандарти судочинства, міжнародні зобов'язання щодо функціонування судової гілки влади. Стверджено, що основними перешкодами незалежної судової системи в Україні є непослідовність втілення стратегічних пріоритетів реформування національної сфери правосуддя та недосконалість державного управління у цій сфері.